HP Jet Fusion 300 User Guide - Page 53

Cooling profile comparison, Provides a long annealing time, which minimizes war

Get HP Jet Fusion 300 PDF manuals and user guides View all HP Jet Fusion 300 manuals
Add to My Manuals
Save this manual to your list of manuals

Page 53 highlights

Why would you use a 30% ratio? ● It optimizes material usage by increasing packing density and build size ● A full-build chamber job with 20% fresh material cannot exceed a certain packing density Why would you use a 40% ratio? ● It optimizes material usage by increasing packing density and build size ● It generates more reusable material ● It improves part strength ● It reduces side holes/porous parts Cooling profile comparison Why would you use Auto cool & reclaim? ● Optimizes part stability and predictable outcomes ● Parts are more likely to warp with this profile than with the Natural cooling profile Why would you use Natural cooling? ● Allows for parts to be cooled as long as desired ● Parts can be extracted manually at minimum contact temperatures ● Provides a long annealing time, which minimizes warpage ● Helps you to avoid damaging delicate features during extraction ● For tracking unlabeled parts Why would you use Fast cool & reclaim? ● Reducing "time to parts" is the most important criteria (up to 6 hours faster for a full build chamber) ● For more information on Fast cooling mode, see the MJF 340-540-580 Fast Cooling whitepaper Cooling profile comparison 47

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • 166
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
  • 174
Why would you use a 30% ratio?
●
It optimizes material usage by increasing packing density and build size
●
A full-build chamber job with 20% fresh material cannot exceed a certain packing density
Why would you use a 40% ratio?
●
It optimizes material usage by increasing packing density and build size
●
It generates more reusable material
●
It improves part strength
●
It reduces side holes/porous parts
Cooling profile comparison
Why would you use Auto cool & reclaim?
●
Optimizes part stability and predictable outcomes
●
Parts are more likely to warp with this profile than with the Natural cooling profile
Why would you use Natural cooling?
●
Allows for parts to be cooled as long as desired
●
Parts can be extracted manually at minimum contact temperatures
●
Provides a long annealing time, which minimizes warpage
●
Helps you to avoid damaging delicate features during extraction
●
For tracking unlabeled parts
Why would you use Fast cool & reclaim?
●
Reducing “time to parts” is the most important criteria (up to 6 hours faster for a full build chamber)
●
For more information on Fast cooling mode, see the MJF 340-540-580 Fast Cooling whitepaper
Cooling profile comparison
47